Crystallography Open Database
- COD Home
- Accessing COD Data
- Add Your Data
- Documentation
Information card for entry 7217573
Preview
Coordinates | 7217573.cif |
---|---|
Original paper (by DOI) | HTML |
Formula | C44 H36 Mo2 N16 |
---|---|
Calculated formula | C44 H36 Mo2 N16 |
SMILES | c1(ccncc1)[N]1=CN(c2ccncc2)[Mo]234[Mo]1(N(c1ccncc1)C=[N]2c1ccncc1)(N(C=[N]3c1ccncc1)c1ccncc1)N(C=[N]4c1ccncc1)c1ccncc1 |
Title of publication | Stepwise formation of heteronuclear coordination networks based on quadruple-bonded dimolybdenum units containing formamidinate ligands |
Authors of publication | Hsu, Wayne; Li, Yu-Sian; He, Hsiu-Yi; Chen, Kuan-Ting; Wu, Hong-Sheng; Proserpio, Davide M.; Chen, Jhy-Der; Wang, Ju-Chun |
Journal of publication | CrystEngComm |
Year of publication | 2014 |
Journal volume | 16 |
Journal issue | 32 |
Pages of publication | 7385 |
a | 17.9447 ± 0.0004 Å |
b | 19.1082 ± 0.0004 Å |
c | 11.5533 ± 0.0002 Å |
α | 90° |
β | 90° |
γ | 90° |
Cell volume | 3961.52 ± 0.14 Å3 |
Cell temperature | 296 ± 2 K |
Ambient diffraction temperature | 296 ± 2 K |
Number of distinct elements | 4 |
Space group number | 56 |
Hermann-Mauguin space group symbol | P c c n |
Hall space group symbol | -P 2ab 2ac |
Residual factor for all reflections | 0.0525 |
Residual factor for significantly intense reflections | 0.0289 |
Weighted residual factors for significantly intense reflections | 0.0591 |
Weighted residual factors for all reflections included in the refinement | 0.0673 |
Goodness-of-fit parameter for all reflections included in the refinement | 1.018 |
Diffraction radiation wavelength | 0.71073 Å |
Diffraction radiation type | MoKα |
Duplicate of | 7215484 |
Has coordinates | Yes |
Has disorder | No |
Has Fobs | No |
Revision | Date | Message | Files |
---|---|---|---|
176432 (current) | 2016-02-14 | cif/ (antanas@kurmis) Replacing _[local]_cod_* tags with their equivalents from the COD CIF dictionary in multiple entries. |
7217573.cif |
124581 | 2014-10-05 | cif/ (saulius@koala.ibt.lt) Marking up 890 duplicates of COD. The duplicates were indentified as entries havin identical DOIs, cell length parameters and formulae, unspecified or identical RI R-factors, and not already marked as duplicates or suboptimal structures. Furthermore, coordinates had to be identical when comparing results of cif2ref conversion: codsql \ 'select d1.file, d1.doi, d2.file, d2.doi from data as d1 join data as d2 on d1.doi = d2.doi where d1.a = d2.a and d1.b = d2.b and d1.c = d2.c and d1.duplicateof is null and d2.duplicateof is null and d1.optimal is null and d2.optimal is null and (d1.RI is null or d2.RI is null or d1.RI = d2.RI) and d1.file > d2.file and (d1.formula = d2.formula or d1.calcformula = d2.calcformula)' \ -NB \ | awk '{print $1, $3}' \ | xargs codid2file \ | xargs -n2 \ | xargs -i bash -c ' \ CIF1=$(echo {} | awk "{print \$1}"); \ CIF2=$(echo {} | awk "{print \$2}"); \ echo -e "\n=== {} ==="; \ diff -bw -u <(cif2ref $CIF1) <(cif2ref $CIF2)' \ | perl -00 -ne 'print unless /^(-|\+)/m' \ | grep . > ~/duplicates-2014-10-05.lst The resulting '~/duplicates-2014-10-05.lst' was post-processed as follows: awk '{print $2, $3}' duplicates-2014-10-05.lst \ | xargs -i bash -c ' \ ID2=$(basename $(echo {} | awk "{print \$2}") .cif); \ CIF1=$(echo {} | awk "{print \$1}"); \ set -x; echo _cod_duplicate_entry $ID2 >> $CIF1' Structures from one powder diffraction paper were reverted: svn revert /home/saulius/struct/cod/cif/4/12/19/412199[567].cif And two files with more than one duplicate identified were fixed by hand: emacs -nw /home/saulius/struct/cod/cif/7/05/43/7054322.cif emacs -nw /home/saulius/struct/cod/cif/7/05/43/7054325.cif |
7217573.cif |
121490 | 2014-08-06 | cif/ Adding structures of 7217573, 7217574, 7217575, 7217576 via cif-deposit CGI script. |
7217573.cif |
All data in the COD and the database itself are dedicated to the
public domain and licensed under the
CC0
License
.
Users of the data should acknowledge the original authors of the
structural data.